Showing posts with label motorcycle protective gear. Show all posts
Showing posts with label motorcycle protective gear. Show all posts

Friday, June 24, 2011

5 Myths About Motorcycle Safety Debunked

Many motorists are trading in their cars for motorcycles partly to save money on gas, partly because of the allure of the sense of freedom that only comes with riding a motorcycle. But if you're new to two wheels, be warned: just as the motorcycle has attained a mythical status within American culture, so too are there many myths concerning motorcycle safety.

texas bikers should not fall for these motorcycle safety urban legends

1. "You should lay your bike down to avoid a crash." FALSE


Laying your bike down is actually just crashing anyway. My guess is that this was a line from a rider who inadvertently found himself on the floor while actually trying to avoid a collision. Maybe before ABS brakes, it was necessary in certain emergencies, but most modern bikes shouldn't have a problem staying upright when stopping quickly. Laying down could actually make things much worse.

2. "Helmets can actually cause more injuries." FALSE


I find it hard to accept that some people actually believe this. Despite urban legends which claim wearing a helmet could impair your vision or could actually cause a rider to break their neck if thrown from their bike, the truth is that countless studies prove the exact opposite. Statistically, wearing a helmet makes you a safer rider as bikers who chose to wear helmets crash far less frequently than those who don't. Additionally, DOT-approved helmets use energy-absorbing technology which prevents neck injuries.

3. "Loud pipes save lives." FALSE


The popularity of loud modified exhaust systems demonstrates the prevalence of the theory that the louder you are, the more likely other motorists will notice you. Not so. Pipes only carry your noise to the rear of the bike, so it only increases awareness to you to those drivers you've already passed - not to those up ahead. It's better to invest in a bright helmet and jacket, which have been proven to save lives.

4. "Don't use your front break." FALSE


Many novice bikers are erroneously taught not to use their front break because if they break too sharply, they could be thrown over the front of the bike. While it's true that 70 percent of a bike's stopping power is in the front break - that's actually power you'll want to use when you need to make a sudden stop. The Motorcycle Safety Foundation teaches new riders to use both the front and rear brakes simultaneously in order to ensure a safe, steady stop.

5. "Splitting lanes is dangerous." FALSE


First off, let me clarify that lane splitting is illegal in Texas. However, a study conducted in California - the only state where the practice is legal - suggests that splitting lanes is actually safer than staying in lane, particularly in heavy, slow-moving traffic. Nonetheless, it's not likely to be legalized in Texas any time soon.

As a Texas Motorcycle Accident Attorney, I've heard all the reasons for why motorcycle accidents occur: "I just didn't see him," or "He was coming so fast" - coming out of the at-fault driver's mouth. But when it comes to you, the rider, make sure you don't fall for any of these motorcycle safety myths. You can't count on regular motorists to be fully aware of their surroundings, which includes you.  So wear the appropriate safety gear, and stay sharp on the roads.  Ride safe.

Monday, June 20, 2011

Motorcycle Protective Clothing: Protection From Injury or Just the Weather?

An Australian study providing new evidence on the injury reduction benefits of motorcycle clothing in crashes will be launched in Sydney today. The study, led by Liz de Rome, Research Fellow, The George Institute for Global Health at The University of Sydney, is the first of its kind and will be published in Accident Analysis and Prevention.

This is the first study in over 25 years to examine the effectiveness of specialised motorcycle protective clothing and in particular, body armour. It is also the first to control for the contribution of other factors that may affect the severity of injury, such as speed or type of impact and age of rider.

One of the key findings of the study, which was funded by Australia’s leading motorcycle insurer Swann Insurance and involved 212 motorcycle and scooter riders, was that riders were significantly less likely to be admitted to hospital if they crashed wearing a motorcycle jacket, pants or gloves.

Ms de Rome said “One of the most important findings was the difference it made to be wearing body armour, particularly for hands and knees.”

When garments included fitted body armour there was a significantly reduced risk of any injury. This included a reduced risk of any injury to the upper body by 23%, legs by 39%, hands by 45% and feet by 45%. The results also found riders wearing shoes or joggers had a much higher risk of foot and ankle injuries, as any type of boot reduced risk of injury by 53%.

While there are limits to the extent clothing can prevent injury in high impact crashes, it is in low impact crashes that protective clothing is thought to offer the greatest injury reduction. There is also evidence that the majority of motorcycle crashes do not involve high impacts.

Ms de Rome commented, “Over 200 motorcyclists die and a further 8,000 are seriously injured on Australian roads each year. For many years, motorcycle safety research has been dominated by debate about the effectiveness of helmets with less focus on other protection for the rider’s body.

“With the increasing human and economic costs of motorcycle injuries around the world, there was a need for research into the effectiveness of protective clothing. We hope that the results of this study will show riders that their gear protects them from more than just the weather, encouraging them to wear more protective clothing which will in turn help reduce injuries.”

The results of the study also send a clear message to the manufacturers of motorcycle protective clothing. The proportion of jackets (29%), pants (28%) and gloves (25%) that failed under crash conditions due to material damage indicates a need for improved quality control.

While mandating usage of protective clothing is not recommended by the study’s authors, consideration could be given to providing incentives for usage of protective clothing, such as tax exemptions for safety gear, health insurance premium reductions and rebates.

Co-investigator, Associate Professor Rebecca Ivers, Director of Injury Research at the George, Institute said “This is ground breaking research. It sends a clear message to riders that protection is important every time they ride, and highlights the need for further investment by Government to encourage riders to wear appropriate clothing, and to work with the industry to improve the quality of products available”.

Stuart Chapman, General Manager of Swann Insurance, said the motorcycle insurer was pleased to have supported this study. “We think it's vitally important that riders have access to information such as the findings of this study so they can make informed decisions about what they should wear every time they ride,” he said.

“Funding this study forms part of Swann's broader commitment to improving rider safety – it’s what we are all about. We encourage every rider to take these findings on board."


source: The George Institute for Global Health